A Review on Corrosion Behaviors and Protection Technologies of Carbon Steel Pipelines in Freshwater Environments

HU Shengzhong, MA Jie, DENG Peichang

Equipment Environmental Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 139-147.

PDF(523 KB)
PDF(523 KB)
Equipment Environmental Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 139-147. DOI: 10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2026.05.016
Key Projects Equipment

A Review on Corrosion Behaviors and Protection Technologies of Carbon Steel Pipelines in Freshwater Environments

  • HU Shengzhong1, MA Jie2, DENG Peichang3,*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The work aims to review the corrosion mechanisms, affecting factors, and protection technologies of carbon steel pipelines in freshwater environments, with a focused analysis on the application of impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) technology to the inner walls of freshwater pipelines. Corrosion of carbon steel pipelines in freshwater environments results from the coupling of chemical, electrochemical, and microbial corrosion processes. The corrosion behavior is affected by multiple factors, including flow velocity, water quality parameters (e.g., pH, dissolved oxygen, aggressive ions), and microbial activity. Compared with seawater, freshwater has lower carbonate content and lower electrical conductivity. The low conductivity of freshwater makes the uniform control of potential distribution a key technical difficulty in cathodic protection. Meanwhile, its low carbonate content hinders the formation of carbonate deposits, thus requiring a higher current density for cathodic protection. For corrosion protection of freshwater pipelines, the combined application of cathodic protection and coating protection delivers a far better performance.

Key words

freshwater environment / pipeline / corrosion / impressed current cathodic protection / low-conductivity environment / potential distribution control

Cite this article

Download Citations
HU Shengzhong, MA Jie, DENG Peichang. A Review on Corrosion Behaviors and Protection Technologies of Carbon Steel Pipelines in Freshwater Environments[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering. 2026, 23(5): 139-147 https://doi.org/10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2026.05.016

References

[1] 张少通, 李伟英, 徐心远, 等. 铁细菌对供水系统金属管材腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 净水技术, 2022, 41(9): 59-66.
ZHANG S T, LI W Y, XU X Y, et al.Effect of Iron Bacteria on Corrosion Behavior of Metal-Pipe Materials in Water Supply System[J]. Water Purification Technology, 2022, 41(9): 59-66.
[2] 张维智, 冯思乔, 宋霄鹏, 等. 聚合物驱集输管道微生物腐蚀行为实验研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(4): 1098-1106.
ZHANG W Z, FENG S Q, SONG X P, et al.Microbial Corrosion of Polymer Flooding Oil Gathering/Transportation Pipeline[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, 2025, 45(4): 1098-1106.
[3] 李林洁. 循环冷却水系统冷却器腐蚀速率的测定方法[J]. 石油化工腐蚀与防护, 2012, 29(3): 8-10.
LI L J.Methods of Corrosion Rate Testing for Coolers in Cooling Water System[J]. Petrochemical Corrosion and Protection, 2012, 29(3): 8-10.
[4] 朱雅仙, 朱锡昶, 葛燕, 等. 流动淡水中钢的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2002, 2: 7-11.
ZHU Y X, ZHU X C, GE Y, et al.Study on Corrosion Behavior of Steel in Flowing Freshwater[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2002, 2: 7-11.
[5] 谭浩. 供水管网管道内铁离子的释放研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2007.
TAN H.Study of iron release in drinking water distribution system[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2007.
[6] YAO J H, GE H H, ZHANG Y, et al.Influence of pH on Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel in Simulated Cooling Water Containing Scale and Corrosion Inhibitors[J]. Materials and Corrosion, 2020, 71(8): 1266-1275.
[7] 陈莉荣, 阚伟海, 姜庆宏, 等. 软化水中除氧剂与pH 值对碳钢腐蚀率影响研究[J]. 表面技术, 2015, 44(7): 108-113.
CHEN L R, HAN W H, JIANG Q H, et al.Study on Effects of pH Value and Oxygen Scavenger on Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel in Softened Water Solution[J]. Surface Technology, 2015, 44(7): 108-113.
[8] 赵乐乐, 李星, 杨艳玲, 等. 南洲水厂原水长距离输水管道水质变化规律研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2014, 30(15): 70-72.
ZHAO L L, LI X, YANG Y L, et al.Study on Water Quality Variation in Long-Distance Water Delivery Pipeline of Nanzhou Water Treatment Plant[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2014, 30(15): 70-72.
[9] CABRINI M, LORENZI S, PASTORE T, et al.Effect of Hot Mill Scale on Hydrogen Embrittlement of High Strength Steels for Pre-Stressed Concrete Structures[J]. Metals, 2018, 8(3): 158.
[10] FANG B, XIE J, YU D Z, et al.Modified Epoxy Coatings Based on BI@ZIF-8@TA for the Application of Long- Effective Corrosion Protection[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2024, 191: 108425.
[11] 许航, 刘伯男, 王月婷, 等. 备用水源原水管道水质及生物膜群落结构变化[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023, 39(5): 38-45.
XU H, LIU B N, WANG Y T, et al.Changes of Water Quality and Biofilm Community Composition in Raw Water Pipeline of Emergency Water Source[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2023, 39(5): 38-45.
[12] 何莎, 邓勇刚, 李经伟, 等. 在有微生物的水中L245钢腐蚀速率模型研究[J]. 石油化工腐蚀与防护, 2021, 38(6): 1-6.
HE S, DENG Y G, LI J W, et al.Corrosion Rate Model of L245 Steel in Simulated Water Containing Microorganisms[J]. Corrosion & Protection in Petrochemical Industry, 2021, 38(6): 1-6.
[13] 侯深贞. 供水管网腐蚀及铁细菌和硫酸盐还原菌灭活试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2012.
HOU S Z.Research on the pipe corrosion and inactivated test of iron bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria in water distribution network[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012.
[14] 田涛, 王月婷, 沈桢, 等. 原水管道藻类浓度对水质及管壁微生物的影响[J]. 给水排水, 2022, 58(3): 123-130.
TIAN T, WANG Y T, SHEN Z, et al.Effects of Algae Concentration in Raw Water Pipeline on Water Quality and Pipe Wall Microorganisms[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2022, 58(3): 123-130.
[15] ZHANG H Y, LIU D B, ZHAO L T, et al.Corrosion Mechanisms of Ductile Iron Pipes in Water Distribution System: Impacts of Ionic Strength and Cement Mortar Lining Coverage[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2020, 197: 237-248.
[16] MŁYŃSKA A, ZIELINA M. The Influence of Prefabricated Pipe Cement Coatings and those Made during Pipe Renovation on Drinking Water Quality[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2017, 17: 00061.
[17] GUIDETTI G P, RIGOSI G L, MARZOLA R.The Use of Polypropylene in Pipeline Coatings[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 1996, 27(1/2/3/4): 79-85.
[18] ZHAO W W, LI F X, LV X H, et al.Research Progress of Organic Corrosion Inhibitors in Metal Corrosion Protection[J]. Crystals, 2023, 13(9): 1329.
[19] TSIRULNIKOVA N V, DRIKER B N, FETISOVA T S, et al.Mg(II) and Zn(II) Сomplexonates with a 1, 3-Diamino-2-Propanol Phosphorus-Containing Derivative as Corrosion and Scaling Inhibitors[J]. International Journal of Corrosion and Scale Inhibition, 2020, 9(1): 362-371.
[20] LIANG J, DENG A Q, XIE R J, et al.Impact of Elevated Ca2+/Mg2+ Concentrations of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Desalinated Seawater on the Stability of Water Pipe Materials[J]. Journal of Water and Health, 2014, 12(1): 24-33.
[21] 王保贝, 刘根太, 张承典, 等. 带状镁基牺牲阳极及其应用[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2002, 23(4): 159-161.
WANG B B, LIU G T, ZHANG C D, et al.Magnesium Ribbon Sacrificial Anode and Its Applications[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2002, 23(4): 159-161.
[22] 刘站飞, 于海峰, 王龙, 等. 阴极保护技术在供水管道防腐中的应用与工程实践[J]. 安装, 2026(1): 72-74.
LIU Z F, YU H F, WANG L, et al.Application and Engineering Practice of Cathodic Protection Technology in Anticorrosion of Water Supply Pipeline[J]. Installation, 2026(1): 72-74.
[23] 施云芬, 孙树森, 张世龙, 等. 牺牲阳极和外加电流联合保护法在长输管道中的应用研究[J]. 表面技术, 2019, 48(8): 286-295.
SHI Y F, SUN S S, ZHANG S L, et al.Application of Combined Protection of Sacrificial Anode and Applied Current in Buried Pipeline[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(8): 286-295.
[24] 王哲, 王恩辉. 新疆某长距离供水工程输水管道防腐设计[J]. 西北水电, 2013(4): 43-44.
WANG Z, WANG E H.Design of Corrosion Protection of One Long-Distance Water Conveyance Pipeline in Xinjiang[J]. Northwest Water Power, 2013(4): 43-44.
[25] 陈龙, 李海洪, 潘峻. 咸淡水钢管桩牺牲阳极设计与施工[J]. 水运工程, 2015(3): 128-131.
CHEN L, LI H H, PAN J.Design and Construction of Galvanic Anode for Steel Pipe Piles in Brackish Water[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2015(3): 128-131.
[26] 裴莹莹, 管方董续成, 张瑞永, 等. Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1在阴极极化条件下对X70管线钢的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(2): 345-354.
PEI Y Y, GUAN F, DONG X C, et al.Effect of Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1 on Corrosive Behavior of Metal Materials under Cathodic Polarization[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, 2024, 44(2): 345-354.
[27] 杨兴乾, 赵少勇, 邹波, 等. 极潮湿环境中管道腐蚀防护研究[J]. 材料保护, 2022, 55(12): 70-78.
YANG X Q, ZHAO S Y, ZOU B, et al.Research on the Corrosion Protection of Pipeline in Extremely Humid Environment[J]. Materials Protection, 2022, 55(12): 70-78.
[28] 曹京宜, 方志刚, 李亮, 等. 国产镀锌钢在不同水环境中的腐蚀行为:I淡水和盐水[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(2): 169-177.
CAO J Y, FANG Z G, LI L, et al.Corrosion Behavior of Domestic Galvanized Steel in Different Water Environment: Fresh Water and Salt Water[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, 2021, 41(2): 169-177.
[29] 葛燕, 朱锡昶, 朱雅仙, 等. 引水钢管内壁阴极保护试验研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2002(2): 30-34.
GE Y, ZHU X C, ZHU Y X, et al.Experimental Study of Cathodic Protection for Internal Surface of Intake Steel Pipes[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2002(2): 30-34.
[30] 亓云飞, 尹鹏飞, 陈亚林, 等. 棒状辅助阳极对小管径管道内壁轴向的保护距离[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2018, 39(2): 144-147.
QI Y F, YIN P F, CHEN Y L, et al.Axial Distance for Protection of Rod-Shaped Auxiliary Anode to Inner Wall of Pipe in Small Diameter[J]. Corrosion and Protection, 2018, 39(2): 144-147.
[31] PURCAR M, BORTELS L.Design and Optimization of Pipeline Cathodic Protection Systems[C]//Analele Universităţii Din Oradea, Fascicula de Energetică. Romania: Elsyca Institute, 2009.
[32] SKURIDIN N N, TYUSENKOV A S, BUGAI D E.Cathodic Protection of Main Oil Pipeline[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2373(8): 082015.
[33] 朱锡昶, 葛燕, 朱雅仙, 等. 流动淡水对钢材阴极保护参数的影响[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2002, 2: 21-25.
ZHU X C, GE Y, ZHU Y X, et al.Effects of Flowing Fresh Water on Cathodic Protection Paramenters of Steel[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2002, 2: 21-25.
[34] 张善泽. 基于SSA算法的管道阴极保护系统参数优化研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2024, 43(4): 7-11.
ZHANG S Z.Parameter Optimization of Pipeline Cathodic Protection System Based on SSA Algorithm[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2024, 43(4): 7-11.
[35] 谭艳芳, 王留超. 阴极保护远程监测系统在大型输水工程中的应用[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2020, 40(9): 77-82.
TAN Y F, WANG L C.Application of Cathodic Protection Remote Monitoring System in Large Water Conveyance Project[J]. Water Conservancy Construction and Management, 2020, 40(9): 77-82.

Funding

Supported by the Sinopec Group Research Project (1646811702731063300)
PDF(523 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/